Economic Relations between Kazakhstan and Russia
in the system of world economic links, in searching for additional
financial resources necessary for the implementation of economic
restructuring and their balanced growth, in defending the interests of the
domestic market from unfavorable conditions in the world economy and from,
foreign competition at the stage of stabilization of their economies.
In choosing a promising export and import specialization, Kazakhstan
and Russia should give preference to commodities that are least susceptible
to market fluctuations. To achieve this, it is necessary to conduct regular
analysis and forecasting of the situation on the markets for the principal
import and export commodities, favoring long-term agreements on their
purchase/selling over one-off deals.
In the medium-term perspective, transition should be effected from
restrictive policies to encouragement, consistently facilitating the
formation of a progressive, structure of exports and creating a
corresponding system of its state support.
Analysis of export/import operations of foreign trade companies and
enterprises shows that, in the absence of combined controls over exports
and currency and of an obligatory norm of currency sales, 1 all export
earnings reach the republic. According to Kazakhstan specialists
calculations, some $0.6-0.8 billion end up on the accounts of Kazakhstan
enterprises in the countries of near and far abroad. According to Russian
experts, corresponding figures for Russia range from $5 to $17 billion. In
this connection, one of the main tasks of management of foreign trade
activities of the two states is the setting up of systems of customs
control over export and import contracts and banking control over currency
earnings, investments, and other commodities.
In future, it is advisable to step up coordination of information
systems of control over repatriation of currency earnings by the customs
bodies and the banking system, which will permit a concentration of efforts
on securing maximum currency earnings from exports.
It is advisable to restrict the decisive role of the state in foreign
economic activity to internationally recognized standards, to be
implemented in accordance with the rules and norms of the World Trade
Organization.
It is also advisable, in a situation of considerable reduction of the
share of state property, to export and import commodities in state
interests only within the framework of intergovernmental agreements, which
must not include any privileges or tax or duty exemptions. For this
purpose, the possibility is created for domestic purchases on a competitive
basis.
The state policy of selective protection in relation to promising
exporting industries and conquering foreign markets gradually becomes one
of the main priorities of economic policy as a whole; it is called, upon to
prepare the implementation of a really proactive export policy, without
which it is impossible to ensure either the payment of foreign debts, or
internal financial stabilization, or investment activity and employment.
Another important task is the achievement of favorable trading
procedures-in relations with foreign countries and their trade and economic
groups, organizations, and unions, as well as the lifting of existing
discriminatory restrictions, and prevention of new ones, with regard to the
member states of the customs union.
To solve this task, plans are made to work consistently and
purposefully toward the entry of Kazakhstan and Russia in the World Trade
Organization, to harmonize our countries' legislative systems with
international norms and principles, and to implement the agreement on
partnership and cooperation with the European Union and agreements with
other countries.
Formation of new economic relations with states of the near abroad will
require a longer that previously believed period of time and a gradual and
coordinated advance toward generally accepted international norms of
organization.
The future economic policy of Kazakhstan in relation to Russia and the
countries of the near abroad must have the following goals development and
rationalization of cooperative economic links in terms of minimizing
expenditure and increasing competitiveness;
— The utilization of transit communications serving the export/import
commodity flows from Customs Union members to third countries;
— Cooperation and coordination of CIS countries' efforts in the
restructuring of production and in optimizing the distribution of
production forces. An active economic policy in relation to countries of
the near abroad is seen as one of the levers for the rehabilitation of the
economy and creating conditions for its upward swing.
Particularly important in the economic relations of Kazakhstan and
Russia is the creation of conditions for establishing horizontal links
between agents operating on the market, the use of new forms of economic
cooperation, such as joint ventures, transnational production, commercial,
and financial structures, and of financial-industrial groups.
Thus the entire course of economic cooperation between Kazakhstan and
Russia and its present state show that there is no alternative to close,
mutually advantageous, and constructive relations between the two
countries. As the two largest countries of post-Soviet space possessing
great natural resources, production potential, and a desire for
cooperation, Kazakhstan and Russia are quite capable of solving the tasks
they face in reforming the economy and achieving the level of economically
developed countries.
Present-day economic science and practice show that economic
integration is the absolute imperative of the future.
CONCLUSION
The analysis, in terms of history and political science, of the birth
and development of new, sovereign states at the end of the 20th century,
considered here in dynamic interaction with the development of other
states, leads us to a number of significant conclusions.
The formation of interstate relations between the Republic of
Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation is an example of synthesis of mutual
relations between two equal agents of international law. Considering the
unique situation and the entire context of ongoing processes, these
relations may be seen as a considerable contribution to the world political
and juridical experience.
An in-depth analysis of the causes of the disintegration of the USSR
was not the goal of the present study; besides, as President Nazarbayev
pointed out, it is difficult and even practically impossible to understand
everything that is connected with this event, which had such stupendous
consequences. However, it is possible to outline the objective and
subjective characteristics of this historical event.
Among the objective factors, economic causes must above all be pointed out.
The rigidly conservative plan-and-command system of the country's economy,
carrying the unbearable burden of the military-industrial complex and
serious structural unbalance, could not meet the real challenges of the
present level of development of the world economy - the postindustrial
resource- and energy-saving revamping of the economy and a breakthrough in
information technology. The inevitable nationality problems that
accumulated in the ethnically diverse Soviet Union called for considerable
attention and timely response to the challenges in this area. Perestroika
suddenly made these challenges topical almost overnight, but it couldn't
provide an adequate solution of the problems within the framework of a
unified state structure. The Novo-Ogarevo project proved Utopian in view of
its goal of achieving a consensus among nearly forty of its participants.
It is no secret that Russia played an integrative role, being a kind
of backbone in the genesis and architecture of the unitary state.
Considering its actual political and economic weight as the most powerful
republic of the Union, it is easy to understand the centrifugal effect of
the separation of the Russian Communist Party from the Communist Party of
the Soviet Union and the subsequent declaration of the sovereignty and
independence of the Russian Federation.
Among other factors, the subjective element also played a role in the
disintegration of the USSR. This element could be analyzed in terms of
persons and situations, but this is not of the greatest importance for the
purposes of the present study.
The dialectical development of Kazakhstani-Russian relations in the
Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18