Economic Relations between Kazakhstan and Russia
president of Kazakhstan dated September 19, 1995 On the Lifting of Customs
Control on the Border between the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Russian
Federation concludes the first stage in the formation of the Customs Union
and orders the implementation of joint customs controls on the Kazakhstan
and Russian sectors of the outer borders of the Customs Union.
At the second stage of the formation of Kazakhstani-Russian-
Belorussian economic efforts to form a customs union, the most important
areas of cooperation are a closer coordination of economic reforms;
harmonization of civil and economic legislation; unification of currency,
tax, and price regulation by the state with the aim of leveling out the
economic and legal conditions for the activities of commodity producers
within a unified customs space; working out coordinated positions of the
members of the Customs Union in relations with third countries and
international organizations. At the meeting of heads of CIS countries in
November 1995, three more countries stated their desire to join the Customs
Union: Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan. Later, only Kyrgyzstan went
through with the necessary procedures and entered the Customs Union.
Another example of collaboration in the field of integration is the
agreement on the Baikonur space vehicle-launching site, which makes it
possible to use this great scientific and technological facility in the
interests of Russia and Kazakhstan, as well as documents on the issues of
citizenship signed by the presidents of Kazakhstan and Russian.
Let us consider in somewhat greater detail the problems of
citizenship, of which the solution on a bilateral basis was also outlined
in the draft project of the EAU.
Issues of citizenship became particularly prominent at the time of the
emergence and building of sovereign independent states after the
disintegration of the USSR, when tens of millions of former Soviet citizens
overnight ended up outside their "historical homelands." This problem is as
topical for Kazakhstan and Russia as for other CIS countries. More than
that, it often figures as one of the most important issues of bilateral
relations with Russia.
The more acute aspects of this problem were lifted as a result of the
signing in January 1995 by the presidents of Russia and Kazakhstan of a
treaty on the legal status of citizens of both countries living on the
territory of the other state and of an agreement on simplified procedures
for acquiring citizenship in moving from one country to another. Well-known
specialists from the two countries worked fruitfully on these documents.
Authoritative Kazakhstan! and Russian politicians and jurists believe that
these are innovative agreements without parallel in the world, and they are
a fairly rare example of regulating bilateral issues on a civilized basis.
The importance of these agreements both for progressive development of our
countries and for normal life of the citizens of Kazakhstan and Russia
cannot be exaggerated.
These documents envisage the introduction of maximally simplified
procedures for acquiring citizenship and for movement without visas; they
also offer possibilities for contract work and military service; assert the
rights of possession, use, and disposal of property; create conditions for
exchange of currency and transfer of sums of money by individuals and
corporate entities of Kazakhstan and Russia; and many other provisions
which reliably protect the rights and interests of the citizens of the two
countries.
Yet another sphere in which combining the efforts of all the
interested parties is needed is the legal status of the Caspian Sea.
The position of the Republic of Kazakhstan on this issue is based on
the need for an early drafting and signing of a convention on the legal
status of the Caspian Sea, of which a draft was worked out by the
Kazakhstan foreign ministry and sent out to all the interested states as
early as March 1994. Unfortunately, there has been no response to this
initiative for quite a long time now, and the agreement on regional
cooperation on the Caspian Sea issue is still at a standstill.
At the same time preserving this unique object of nature is a task that the
present generation must be worthy of.
The events of the recent years thus prove conclusively the need to
proceed to a new level of integration, which will fully conform to the
vital needs of the peoples. International experience shows that any
interstate association goes through various states in its development,
becoming enriched in the process with new forms of cooperation. The
Eurasian Union should be seen as just one of such transitional forms
capable of optimizing the solution of the problems facing the Commonwealth.
From the time of the publication of the draft EAU project, politicians
and scholars have been paying close attention to it. Four major scientific
and practical conferences were devoted to this subject, as were hundreds of
publications in Kazakhstan, Russia, and other states. Politicians,
scholars, and diplomats continue to study the EAU project with great
attention.
The current period in history is characterized by a radical breakdown of
the old way of life. Society now faces difficult issues, and each person is
subject to serious trials It is quite natural under these conditions that
the peoples of Kazakhstan, Russia, and other countries with an interest in
the unification of the Commonwealth will find it easier to overcome these
difficulties together. A balanced attitude toward the past, a persistent
realization of the present potential, and confidence in a more certain
future - only these things will be able to give the peoples of our
countries a natural feeling of spiritual harmony and a sense of full-
blooded life.
History is offering us a chance to enter the 21st century in a
civilized manner. One of the ways to achieve that, in my view, is the
realization of the integration potential for the establishment of the
Eurasian Union, which will reflect the objective logic of the development
of the post-Soviet space and the will of the peoples of the former Soviet
Union to achieve integration.
This is how President Nazarbayev, the author of the Eurasian project,
characterized the development of this idea and his current vision of its
future: "I still remain an adherent of integration of post-Soviet space. As
I formulated my vision of integration I laid no claims to total realization
of all the provisions of the project, being fully aware of all the
political connotations of that period. Two considerations were my primary
motivation. First, I wanted to generalize within a single whole the most
realistic proposals for further integration, which simultaneously appeared
in the countries of the post-Soviet space. Second, I wished to interrupt
the indecently drawn-out pause in the activities of the CIS institutions.
In the last two years there was movement in the CIS countries on some
issues that had been at a standstill, including
4. VITAL PROBLEMS OF THE PRESENT-DAY STATE OF KAZAKHSTANI-RUSSIAN RELATIONS
The Present State and Prospects for Economic Cooperation between
Kazakhstan and Russia.
The top priority area of Kazakhstan’s policy in foreign trade is the
strengthening of economic cooperation with Russia and consistent
integration of the economies of the CIS countries. This is determined by
the traditionally strong economic links, a high level of mutual
complementarily and interdependence of two economies of a once unified
state, the size of the commodity market and identify of economic problems
awaiting solution. “Analysis of the results of development of the economy
of the former USSR and of experiences of economically advanced nations,”
President Nazarbayev stressed, “shows that the transition to the market is
objectively necessary and historically inevitable.”
The main feature of the present-day situation in Kazakhstan is the
increasing impact of the mechanisms that have evolved in the years of
reform and a weakening of the effect of non-market factors. In the initial
stages, the underdeveloped state of such important instruments of the
formation of the market as privatization, de-monopolization, absence of a
competitive environment, were the main sources of inflation in the
republic, a worsening state of the finances of enterprisers, an acute
shortage of turnover capital, a fall in production due to falling demand
and real earnings of the main mass of the population, as well as growing
Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18