Economic Relations between Kazakhstan and Russia
signed. The sides agreed that tariff and quantitative restrictions on
mutual trade will be lifted through the setting up of fully identical
systems of regulation of external economic links, unconditional guarantees
for effective joint protection of the external borders of the member states
of the Customs Union, and establishment of identical trade procedures,
common customs tariffs, and measures for non-tariff regulation with respect
to third countries. It was stressed that the development of foreign
economic links will be promoted by the stage-by-stage formation of a
clearing union to ensure continuous clearing on the basis of mutual
convertibility of national currencies and formation of an effective payment
system.
An agreement was reached to render state support to the development of
direct links and cooperation between enterprises, to the establishment of
financial-industrial groups, formation of favorable conditions for mutual
access and protection of investment, and acquiring real estate,
Measures were outlined for the formation of a common
scientific/technological space for a more rational utilization of the
available intellectual, scientific, and technical potential.
State delegations headed by deputy heads of governments take part in
regular monthly sittings of the commission. These sessions consider the
implementation of agreements, analyze the state of affairs in the practical
formation of the customs union, and coordinate joint measures.
At the same time each side set up its own national sections of the
intergovernmental commission on the customs union. Five groups were set up
in the framework of each national commission to cover the following areas:
1. Creation of the Customs Union. Solving tasks in the realization of a
mechanism for the establishment, of a. free trade zone; working out
normative acts for the unification of currency, financial, and general
legislation; preparing proposals for the introduction of unified procedures
for foreign trade regulation and an identical customs tariff, for
coordinating a unified procedure of customs control, for working out an
agreement on unified management of customs services, and so on.
2. Harmonization of legislative systems to coordinate the legal basis
of agreements with agreements already achieved and to eliminate
discrepancies in the economic legislative systems of the states, and to
solve other issues.
3. Realization of the provisions of treaties; of friendship,
cooperation, and mutual assistance; preparation of draft agreements and
documents on freedom of movement, citizens' legal status, conversion,
mutual debts of enterprises, and on military cooperation.
4. The development of production and enterprise. Taking coordinated
measures for economic reforms, preparing agreements on scientific and
technological cooperation, investment activity, state support of
enterprises participating in joint financial-industrial groups.
5. In the area of finances and payment relations: the organization of
work on providing regular quotations for the national currencies, on the
setting up of a network of currency exchange points, on concluding an
inter bank agreement on mutual access to domestic markets of authorized
banks, on working out a common mechanism for currency regulation and
control, on unification of taxes and their size, on the methodology of
price formation, and so on.
Practically all issues have been resolved in. the framework of the
three countries on non-tariff regulation of foreign trade activity; work
on the unification of normative legal acts in this area has been
completed. The partners came to an agreement on the procedure for
registering contracts on exports of strategically important commodities.
Work is being completed on the establishment of unified operation
modes in trading with countries and on re export of commodities.
Apart from bilateral agreements, the Customs: Union also relies on a
number of multilateral agreements and conventions adopted by the CIS
Countries, including The Foundations of Customs Legislation, A Unified
Methodology for the Customs Statistics on Foreign Trade, On the Movement of
CIS Countries' Citizens Through Their Territories Without Visas, On
Guarantees for the Rights of Individuals Belonging to National Minorities,
On the Establishment of a Unified System of Air Defense of CIS Member
States, and On Legal Aid and Legal Relations in Civil, Family, and Criminal
Cases.
Thus the main principle on which the Customs Union is founded is the
existence of a unified customs territory and a uniform mechanism for
regulating the economy, based on unified legislation.
Toward the end of 1995, significant changes occurred in the trade and
economic relations of Kazakhstan and Russia. The agreement was revised on
trade and economic relations; the emphasis was made on the development of
direct links between producers, which resulted in a considerable increase
in the exchange of products. In 1995, trade between Kazakhstan and Russia
amounted to $319 billion, or 54 percent of the total volume of the
republic’s trades, an increase of 55.4 percent on the same period in the
previous year. Exports amounted to $2.1 billion, which made up 42 percent
of the total volume of Kazakhstan export; exceeding the 1994 figures by a
factor of 1.5. Imports reached the $1.8 billion mark, or 49 percent of all
imports, exceeding the 1994 imports by 66 percent.
Work on the formation of the Customs Union can thus be seen as one of
the main achievements in the field of economic integration of Kazakhstan
and Russia. A breakthrough was achieved in the establishment of a common
market. The three countries established a unified customs zone and
eliminated controls at their internal borders. Close businesslike links
were established between the customs services.
The Customs Union brings tangible results to each of its members. The
overall volume of trade between the CIS countries outside the Customs Union
continued to fall, while the lifting of custom barriers enabled Kazakhstan,
Russia, and Byelorussia to considerably increase commodity circulation.
In October 1995, the heads of the governments of Russia, Kazakhstan,
and Byelorussia issued a joint appeal to the governments of CIS member
states to join the triple union. Running somewhat ahead of the story, let
us note that in March 1996 Kyrgyzstan joined the customs union.
At the same time progress in the development of bilateral economic
relations is checked by a number of problems, notably by chronic nonpayment
of mutual debts. Kazakhstan's debt for electric power received from Russia
grew almost threefold in 1995. In turn, Russia owed a large sum to
Kazakhstan for the coal from Ekibastuz.
Serious possibilities are sometimes missed for successful cooperation
between enterprises in the fuel and energy complex, in metallurgy, and
other branches of the economy of Kazakhstan and Russia. Close production
links became established between the Orskneftegazsintez JSC and the
Aktyubinskneft JSC, which form the Orenburg JSC. Early in 1995, the
management of these associations conducted mutual consultations and decided
that a joint oil company must be set up.
In Russia, the formation of financial-industrial groups went on at an
increasing pace. The results of their work in 1995 show that integration of
industrial and banking capital had a positive impact on economic
development.
Further effective economic cooperation between Kazaklistan and Russia
calls for systematic analysis and work on a mechanism of control over the
implementation of bilateral Kazaklistani-Russian treaties and agreements.
The following tasks should in our view be singled out in the field of
economic cooperation between Kazaklistan and Russia that are of mutual
interest and call for coordinated decisions of the governments:
a) Stabilization of export of raw materials and subsequent increase in
it as a basis for the growth of currency earnings for the
modernization of production;
b) Diversification of exports;
c) Additional currency and investment resources for restructuring the
economy;
d) Support for active trading policy on CIS countries' potential
markets;
e) Moderate protectionism in relation to newly created import-replacing
production lines.
Under these conditions the two countries will have to solve new
problems in economic integration in the framework of the Customs Union and
Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18