RSS    

   Short Overview of African Countries

debt and has been struggling to meet the stipulations of foreign aid

donors.

Ghana Well endowed with natural resources, Ghana has twice the per

capita output of the poorer countries in West Africa. Even so, Ghana

remains heavily dependent on international financial and technical

assistance. Gold, timber, and cocoa production are major sources of foreign

exchange. The domestic economy continues to revolve around subsistence

agriculture, which accounts for 40% of GDP and employs 60% of the work

force, mainly small landholders. In 1995-97, Ghana made mixed progress

under a three-year structural adjustment program in cooperation with the

IMF. On the minus side, public sector wage increases and regional

peacekeeping commitments have led to continued inflationary deficit

financing, depreciation of the cedi (national currency), and rising public

discontent with Ghana's austerity measures. A rebound in gold prices is

likely to push growth over 5% in 2000-01.

Kenya. Kenya is well placed to serve as an engine of growth in East

Africa, but its economy is stagnating because of poor management and uneven

commitment to reform. In 1993, the government of Kenya implemented a

program of economic liberalization and reform that included the removal of

import licensing, price controls, and foreign exchange controls. With the

support of the World Bank, IMF, and other donors, the reforms led to a

brief turnaround in economic performance following a period of negative

growth in the early 1990s. Kenya's real GDP grew 5% in 1995 and 4% in 1996,

and inflation remained under control. Growth slowed in 1997-99 however.

Political violence damaged the tourist industry, and Kenya's Enhanced

Structural Adjustment Program lapsed due to the government's failure to

maintain reform or address public sector corruption. A new economic team

was put in place in 1999 to revitalize the reform effort, strengthen the

civil service, and curb corruption, but wary donors continue to question

the government's commitment to sound economic policy. Long-term barriers to

development include electricity shortages, the government's continued and

inefficient dominance of key sectors, endemic corruption, and the country's

high population growth rate.

Lesotho. Small, landlocked, and mountainous, Lesotho's only important

natural resource is water. Its economy is based on subsistence agriculture,

livestock, and remittances from miners employed in South Africa. The number

of such mine workers has declined steadily over the past several years. In

1996 their remittances added about 33% to GDP compared with the addition of

roughly 67% in 1990. A small manufacturing base depends largely on farm

products which support the milling, canning, leather, and jute industries.

Agricultural products are exported primarily to South Africa. Proceeds from

membership in a common customs union with South Africa form the majority of

government revenue. Although drought has decreased agricultural activity

over the past few years, completion of a major hydropower facility in

January 1998 now permits the sale of water to South Africa, generating

royalties that will be an important source of income for Lesotho. The pace

of parastatal privatization has increased in recent years. Civil disorder

in September 1998 destroyed 80% of the commercial infrastructure in Maseru

and two other major towns. Most firms were not covered by insurance, and

the rebuilding of small and medium business has been a significant

challenge in terms of both economic growth and employment levels. Output

dropped 10% in 1998 and recovered slowly in 1999.

Mozambique. Before the peace accord of October 1992, Mozambique's

economy was devastated by a protracted civil war and socialist

mismanagement. In 1994, it ranked as one of the poorest countries in the

world. Since then, Mozambique has undertaken a series of economic reforms.

Almost all aspects of the economy have been liberalized to some extent.

More than 900 state enterprises have been privatized. Pending are tax and

much needed commercial code reform, as well as greater private sector

involvement in the transportation, telecommunications, and energy sectors.

Since 1996, inflation has been low and foreign exchange rates stable.

Albeit from a small base, Mozambique's economy grew at an annual 10% rate

in 1997-99, one of the highest growth rates in the world. Still, the

country depends on foreign assistance to balance the budget and to pay for

a trade imbalance in which imports outnumber exports by five to one or

more. The medium-term outlook for the country looks bright, as trade and

transportation links to South Africa and the rest of the region are

expected to improve and sizable foreign investments materialize. Among

these investments are metal production (aluminum, steel), natural gas,

power generation, agriculture (cotton, sugar), fishing, timber, and

transportation services. Additional exports in these areas should bring in

needed foreign exchange. In addition, Mozambique is on track to receive a

formal cancellation of a large portion of its external debt through a World

Bank initiative.

Rwanda. Rwanda is a rural country with about 90% of the population

engaged in (mainly subsistence) agriculture. It is the most densely

populated country in Africa; is landlocked; and has few natural resources

and minimal industry. Primary exports are coffee and tea. The 1994 genocide

decimated Rwanda's fragile economic base, severely impoverished the

population, particularly women, and eroded the country's ability to attract

private and external investment. However, Rwanda has made significant

progress in stabilizing and rehabilitating its economy. GDP has rebounded,

and inflation has been curbed. In June 1998, Rwanda signed an Enhanced

Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF) with the IMF. Rwanda has also

embarked upon an ambitious privatization program with the World Bank.

Continued growth in 2000 depends on the maintenance of international aid

levels and the strengthening of world prices of coffee and tea.

Zambia. Despite progress in privatization and budgetary reform,

Zambia's economy has a long way to go. The recent privatization of the huge

government-owned Zambia Consolidated Copper Mines (ZCCM) should greatly

improve Zambia's prospects for international debt relief, as the government

will no longer have to cover the mammoth losses generated by that sector.

Inflation and unemployment rates remain high, however.

Zimbabwe. The government of Zimbabwe faces a wide variety of difficult

economic problems as it struggles to consolidate earlier progress in

developing a market-oriented economy. Its involvement in the war in the

Democratic Republic of the Congo, for example, has already drained hundreds

of millions of dollars from the economy. Badly needed support from the IMF

suffers delays in part because of the country's failure to meet budgetary

goals. Inflation rose from an annual rate of 32% in 1998 to 59% in 1999.

The economy is being steadily weakened by AIDS; Zimbabwe has the highest

rate of infection in the world. Per capita GDP, which is twice the average

of the poorer sub-Saharan nations, will increase little if any in the near-

term, and Zimbabwe will suffer continued frustrations in developing its

agricultural and mineral resources.

So the generalization is obvious. The countries which have the highest

GDP per capita are oil, gas as well as other raw materials exporters.

Almost none of the countries has stable source of incomes. Oil exporters

are in a better condition then the last, but it has a number of negative

consequences. The first is that their economy are heavily dependant on the

oil prices. The next is that even the richest resources may be easily

wasted if the incomes are not managed properly. The corruption in a

government, continuous possibility of warfare wouldn’t let foreign capital

flow easily into these countries. Even the oil fields couldn’t attract

investitions if there’s no political stability. Though the most population

of these countries are involved in agriculture the most of them couldn’t

provide enough food for themselves. The reason is simple lack of water

resources. A number of countries having a lot of resources are not able to

use them efficently because of continuous warfares, which are draining

budgets. These are the major negative facts considering African economy,

but there are a lot of positive ones.

According to ECA’s "Africa Economic Report 2000" shows, for five years

Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5


Новости


Быстрый поиск

Группа вКонтакте: новости

Пока нет

Новости в Twitter и Facebook

                   

Новости

© 2010.